Evolution is currently being promoted as a scientific fact and this is a misnomer. Evolution is a theory proposed by Charles Darwin and relies on a theoretical framework created by the extrapolation of ideas from the observation of life. The theory of ideas to support the origin of species has been put forward as facts to support the legitimacy of evolution as a scientific discovery. There is a big difference between observable facts and these same facts being used to support a theory of life.
The observation of these facts leads to the theory of evolution supported by the facts, which is depended on the interpretation of those facts. The assumptions based on the observations of these facts led Charles Darwin to draw the conclusion, that due to certain commonalty of traits within species, they must of at some stage have had a common ancestor. He then expanded this assumption to all species, proposing that different species originated from a common ancestor, thus crossing the species boundary.
We can safely assume that evolution can and does happen within species and this process is well documented. But what is not acceptable is that one species cannot transform into a completely new set of species. This is impossible and there is no evidence that supports this transformation of species into another. The genome of one species cannot and does not allow cross species fertilization, evolution can only happen within the genetic framework of the same genome.
The theory of evolution proposes that these evolutionary changes occurred over millions of years and that millions of transitional species existed prior to transforming into new species. If this was the case then archaeologists and paleontologists should be able to find millions of transitional species, but they haven’t. They have only found species in their completeness. This supports the idea that species just appeared fully formed with no cross species evolution taking place.
The theory of evolution unlike other hard sciences, like physics and chemistry cannot be proven by rigorous experimentation within a controlled environment. Thus relies on the interpretation of observable facts to support its claim. Without experimentation within a controlled environment, the theory of evolution can never become a scientific fact.
Evolution is based on the survival of the fittest, which only encourages the most effective genes for survival, so only the most able and strongest animals survive, based on the characteristics of the genes that they have inherited. This however does not support the creation of new species. But it does support the continuation of the survival of the same species.
Although Evolution creates a theoretical model to explain life on earth, following this logic sequentially backwards, the underlying assumption is that life originated from a single simple life form. And that at some stage this simple life form was created from an inanimate non-life material. Following the logic proposed by the theory of evolution, purports that life was created from non-life. This theory is completely unsupported with no factual evidence. Life can never come from non-life, and scientists will never be able to create life from non-life in their laboratories.
With the advancement of technology, scientists have now been able to observe and categorize the genetic composition of species. This has led to the findings, that human beings share 99% of the same genetic material as chimpanzees. This is an observable fact and scientists uses this observable fact to support the theory of evolution as evidence and proof.
The flaw is not in the observable facts, but in the interpretation of those observable facts. The evolutionists claim that these observable facts are infallible evidence that scientifically proves the theory of evolution. The observable facts have not and will not ever support the theory of evolution, and is purely based on the faith of belief, that their interpretation of the observable facts are correct. This is why evolution is a materialistic religion, because religion is based on faith. Evolutionists cling to observable facts and insist that their theory is scientifically proven, but in reality they are relying on faith.
Another interpretation of these observable facts, and one that I believe to be true is that the commonality between these species and their genome is evidence of a common creator. And this creator used the same building blocks of genetic material to create life. This is the reason why we share so much common genetic material with other species on the planet. God used these varying genetic material to create different species in their entirety, without any intermediate stages. Which is why you can never find evidence of transitional species.
God created life from non-life which is the only explanation of how inanimate objects became animate life forms. No form of experimentation will ever generate life, because the breath of life only belongs to god and god only breathes life into those he chooses. Man cannot and never will be able to breathe life into non-animate objects.
The same observable facts that evolutionists use to support the theory of evolution is in fact, real evidence that supports the existence of god. How else could life have been created on earth? How else could species spontaneously appear from nowhere fully formed?
This is the reason why evolution is a religion and not based on scientific experimentation.
If you enjoyed reading my posts and they resonate with you Click here to receive my posts by email